<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The problems with asymmetric routing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/</link>
	<description>Share your knowledge!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 07:09:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ayuda de VLAN de laboratorio doméstico - configurar-router.info		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-2680</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ayuda de VLAN de laboratorio doméstico - configurar-router.info]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 07:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkguy.de/?p=409#comment-2680</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Los problemas del enrutamiento asíncrono http://networkguy.de/?p=409 [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Los problemas del enrutamiento asíncrono <a href="http://networkguy.de/?p=409" rel="ugc">http://networkguy.de/?p=409</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michel		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-618</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkguy.de/?p=409#comment-618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Jason,

yes you are right ;) thank you! I uploaded a new picture.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p>
<p>yes you are right ;) thank you! I uploaded a new picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Management network topology and asymmetric routing &#171; LTLnetworker &#124; IT hálózatok, biztonság, Cisco		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-605</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Management network topology and asymmetric routing &#171; LTLnetworker &#124; IT hálózatok, biztonság, Cisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkguy.de/?p=409#comment-605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] a single exit point (routing device). If not, problems arise, the simplest form is described in this article of Network Guy. Exit point means any layer3 forwarding device with an interface in this segment [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a single exit point (routing device). If not, problems arise, the simplest form is described in this article of Network Guy. Exit point means any layer3 forwarding device with an interface in this segment [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Hudson		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-604</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Hudson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 20:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkguy.de/?p=409#comment-604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the great article. In the second diagram, shouldn&#039;t the 192.168.1.8 ip on the vpn gateway be deleted? That device will only have a 10.20.30.2 address and a vpn address right?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great article. In the second diagram, shouldn&#8217;t the 192.168.1.8 ip on the vpn gateway be deleted? That device will only have a 10.20.30.2 address and a vpn address right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michel		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkguy.de/?p=409#comment-575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[oh yes :D i will change the topic, thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yes :D i will change the topic, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ltlnetworker		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-562</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ltlnetworker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2015 10:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkguy.de/?p=409#comment-562</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[you mean asymmetric routing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you mean asymmetric routing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michel		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkguy.de/?p=409#comment-427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-426&quot;&gt;Nimca&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Nimca,

every hop (router) needs to have the default route. So if we look at the third picture: 192.168.2.1 needs to configure default-route pointed to 192.168.1.8, 192.168.1.8 needs a default route to 192.168.1.1.

From the second site: Do a &quot;tracert 8.8.8.8&quot; where did the traceroute end?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-426">Nimca</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Nimca,</p>
<p>every hop (router) needs to have the default route. So if we look at the third picture: 192.168.2.1 needs to configure default-route pointed to 192.168.1.8, 192.168.1.8 needs a default route to 192.168.1.1.</p>
<p>From the second site: Do a &#8220;tracert 8.8.8.8&#8221; where did the traceroute end?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nimca		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nimca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 15:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkguy.de/?p=409#comment-426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-424&quot;&gt;Michel&lt;/a&gt;.

Hello Michel,

The main router in a RV042G ( connected to Internet ). I need to create a VPN connection to a second site ( connected directly by fiber, not over the Internet ). I had began with the first version. VPN is working well but I cannot have Internet acces from second site.  Then I have tried the third solution. I had the same results. All routers are RV042G.
 - Computer from both sites can see each other.
 - Computers from site 1 have Internet access
 - Computer from site 2 cannot acces Internet ( ping to google by name or by IP it&#039;s not working)

Thank you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-424">Michel</a>.</p>
<p>Hello Michel,</p>
<p>The main router in a RV042G ( connected to Internet ). I need to create a VPN connection to a second site ( connected directly by fiber, not over the Internet ). I had began with the first version. VPN is working well but I cannot have Internet acces from second site.  Then I have tried the third solution. I had the same results. All routers are RV042G.<br />
 &#8211; Computer from both sites can see each other.<br />
 &#8211; Computers from site 1 have Internet access<br />
 &#8211; Computer from site 2 cannot acces Internet ( ping to google by name or by IP it&#8217;s not working)</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michel		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-424</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkguy.de/?p=409#comment-424</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-406&quot;&gt;Nimca&lt;/a&gt;.

I think I didn&#039;t understand your requirement. What do you want exactly? You just need an additional interface and so you can do routing between it. It doesn&#039;t need to be a &quot;WAN&quot; interface or so]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-406">Nimca</a>.</p>
<p>I think I didn&#8217;t understand your requirement. What do you want exactly? You just need an additional interface and so you can do routing between it. It doesn&#8217;t need to be a &#8220;WAN&#8221; interface or so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nimca		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/the-problems-with-asynchronous-routing/#comment-406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nimca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkguy.de/?p=409#comment-406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello,

Thank you for a good article.

I have some problems in implementing what I have read. I cannot have Internet access from 192.168.2.78.
Can you please tell me if router 10.20.30.2 from your diagram has to be one with two  WAN ports ( RV042G for example ) or it will work only with one WAN.

Thank you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Thank you for a good article.</p>
<p>I have some problems in implementing what I have read. I cannot have Internet access from 192.168.2.78.<br />
Can you please tell me if router 10.20.30.2 from your diagram has to be one with two  WAN ports ( RV042G for example ) or it will work only with one WAN.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
