<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New Sophos UTM update 9.410-6	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://networkguy.de/new-sophos-utm-update-9-410-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://networkguy.de/new-sophos-utm-update-9-410-6/</link>
	<description>Share your knowledge!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Michel		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/new-sophos-utm-update-9-410-6/#comment-1167</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://networkguy.de/?p=1516#comment-1167</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://networkguy.de/new-sophos-utm-update-9-410-6/#comment-1166&quot;&gt;daniel337pvs&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Daniel,

the changelogs are not clear but I think the last two items will fix the problems:

NUTM-6804		[AWS] Update breaks HVM standalone installations
NUTM-6747		[Email] SAVI scanner coredumps permanently in MailProxy after update to 9.410
NUTM-6802		[Web] New coredumps from httpproxy after update to v9.410]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://networkguy.de/new-sophos-utm-update-9-410-6/#comment-1166">daniel337pvs</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Daniel,</p>
<p>the changelogs are not clear but I think the last two items will fix the problems:</p>
<p>NUTM-6804		[AWS] Update breaks HVM standalone installations<br />
NUTM-6747		[Email] SAVI scanner coredumps permanently in MailProxy after update to 9.410<br />
NUTM-6802		[Web] New coredumps from httpproxy after update to v9.410</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: daniel337pvs		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/new-sophos-utm-update-9-410-6/#comment-1166</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daniel337pvs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://networkguy.de/?p=1516#comment-1166</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Should be hopefully fixed with the newest patch that Sophos placed on their FTP server today: u2d-sys-9.410006-411003.tgz.gpg]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should be hopefully fixed with the newest patch that Sophos placed on their FTP server today: u2d-sys-9.410006-411003.tgz.gpg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrick Hener		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/new-sophos-utm-update-9-410-6/#comment-1162</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Hener]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://networkguy.de/?p=1516#comment-1162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sophos is working on a fix. They provided a rpm to most of our customers which fixes the problem. So I guess a minor bugfix release will come pretty soon to get rid of the problem.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sophos is working on a fix. They provided a rpm to most of our customers which fixes the problem. So I guess a minor bugfix release will come pretty soon to get rid of the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/new-sophos-utm-update-9-410-6/#comment-1160</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://networkguy.de/?p=1516#comment-1160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jep, I was also affected by this bug ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jep, I was also affected by this bug &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michel		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/new-sophos-utm-update-9-410-6/#comment-1159</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://networkguy.de/?p=1516#comment-1159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://networkguy.de/new-sophos-utm-update-9-410-6/#comment-1158&quot;&gt;Patrick Hener&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Patrick,

thank you for this info!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://networkguy.de/new-sophos-utm-update-9-410-6/#comment-1158">Patrick Hener</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Patrick,</p>
<p>thank you for this info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrick Hener		</title>
		<link>https://networkguy.de/new-sophos-utm-update-9-410-6/#comment-1158</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Hener]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 12:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://networkguy.de/?p=1516#comment-1158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Be aware that Sophos implemented a bug in this Update which crashes the smtp proxy unless you switch to singe av scan with avira. That workaround makes sandstorm useless as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be aware that Sophos implemented a bug in this Update which crashes the smtp proxy unless you switch to singe av scan with avira. That workaround makes sandstorm useless as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
